Lewis Carroll Essay -- essays research papers fc

JabberwockyLewis CarrollJabberwocky Sense or bunkumTwas brillig, and the slithy tovesDid gyre and gimble in the wabeAll mimsy were the borogoves,And the mome raths outgrabe."mind the Jabberwock, my sonThe jaws that bite, the claws that catchBeware the Jubjub bird, and shunThe frumious Bandersnatch"He took his vorpal sword in handLong cadence the manxome foe he sought--So rested he by the Tumtum tree,And stood for a while in thought.And, as in uffish thought he stood,The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,Came whiffling through and through the tulgey wood,And burbied as it cameOne, two One, two And through and throughThe vorpal blade went snicker-snackHe left it dead, and with its headHe went galumphing back."And hast thou slain the Jabberwock?Come to my arms, my cheerful boyO frabjous day Callooh Callay"He chortled in his joy.Twas brillig, and the slithy tovesDid gyre and gimble in the wabeAll mimsy were the borogoves,And the mome raths outgrabe.    &n bsp                                             1886ParaphraseIn attempting to paraphrase this particular poem it must(prenominal) be considered that it derived from a book written almost purely of hokum. umpteen of the words in this poem are the own creation of the origin and only he knows the real interpretation. However, some of the words have been set forth in the book and others in letters by the author. The words of the old poem are often a combination of two, maybe veritable(a) three words, all put into one, while others are just nonsense and for the amusement of the reader. All things considered, here is an attempt at a telephone circuit by line paraphrase of the poem "Jabberwocky".Jabberwocky Sense or bunkumIt was evening, and the smooth active badgersWere scratching and boring ho les in the hill-sideAll uncheerful were the parrotsAnd the grave turtles squeaked outBeware of the Jabberwock, my sonOf its jaws that bite, and its claws that catchBe cognizant of the Jubjub bird, and shunThe fuming and furious BandersnatchHe took his mighty sword i... ...roll did in his works.BibliographyBlake, Kathleen Lewis Carroll. dictionary of literary Biography. Ed. Ira B. Nadel, William E. Fredeman. Rev. Ed. 18 vols. Detroit, Michigan Gale Research Company, 1983Carroll, Lewis. Alice in Wonderland. Norton small Edition. New York W.W. Norton and Company, 1992."Carroll, Lewis," Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2000http//encarta.msn.com 1997-2000 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.Connell, Kate. "Opium as a Possible exercise upon Alice Books" 22 Mar 2000. The Victorian Web. <http//landow.stg.brown.edu/victorian/victov.html>.Egoff, Sheila A. " orbits Within Childrens Fantasy from the center of attention Ages to Today. Chicago American L ibrary Association, 1988.Empson, William. "Alice in Wonderland The Child as Swain." 1935. World Literature Criticism, 1500 to the Present. Ed. James P. Draper. Vol. 1. Detroit Gale, 1992. 634-35.Sewell, Elizabeth. The Field of Nonsense London Chatto and Windus LTD., 1952.Smith, Karen Lewis Carroll. Dictionary Literary Biography. Ed. Meena Khorana. Rev. ed. 163 vols. Detroit, Michigan Gale Research Inc., 1996

Physics of Rainbows :: physics rainbow weather

Imagine a sky effective of dark fluffy clouds. The air feels wet and sticky, and rain drops begin to fall. concisely the drops become a sheet of rain and this makes you sad because your outdoor shimmer is over. But, just as you turn your back to go inside, you feel the cheerfulness break through the clouds and warm your back. A smile fills your face because you soak up that rain plus sun equals a rainbow. You turn around to manipulate a glorious rainbow in the sky. As you gaze, questions begin to pop into your head. What be rainbows? Who are some scientists that studied them? What makes the colors? Why is in that respect a double bow? So what are rainbows? It might be easier to inauguration with what they arent by clarifying some common myths about them. * There is an kibosh to the rainbow. -- This is not true. A rainbow is relative to the observers position. Because of this, as an observer moves, so does the rainbow. This way that the end moves as well, and ca n never be found. Also formerly the sun has disappeared or the observer turns to face the sun, the rainbow disappears. * There is a eatage of gold waiting for me at the end. -- For the resaons stated above, there is no end. Because there is no end, well...there is no gold. Sorry * Rainbows are real physical open things.-- Rainbows are optical illusions. They are something that a person can see, barely are not something that a person can really touch. If Rainbows arent real...and there is so end to them...and therefor no gold....so what is a rainbow if its not a magical gold giving wonder? * According to Websters Dictionary A rainbow is an arc containing the colors of the spectrum formed in the sky by the refraction, reflection, and sprinkling of light in rain or fog. * Rainbows are an optical illusion. -- As stated before, they are an illusion and are dependent on the observers shoot down of view. When it starts to rain and an observer has his back to the sun, refraction, reflection, and dispersion occurs and a rainbow is most presumable to be seen.

Truth about Sammy in John Updikes A&P Essay -- A&P Essays

The Truth about Sammy in A & P At first glance, Sammy, the first-person narrator of John Updikes A & P, would seem to put in us with a simple and glib explanation as to wherefore he quits his job at the grocery store mentioned in the title he is standing up for the girls that his boss, Lengel, has insulted. He even tries to shell out us on this explanation by mentioning how the girls embarrassment at the pass on of the manager makes him feel scrunchy inside and by referring to himself as their unsuspected adept after he goes through with his gesture. Upon closer examination, though, it does not seem plausible that Sammy would have quit in defense of girls whom he quite evidently despises, despite the lustful desires they invoke, and that more analogously explanations of his action lie in his boredom with his menial job and his desire to rebel against his parents. While its authentic that Sammy finds the triplet scantily-clad girls who enter the supermarket attractive, as would any normal nineteen-year-old male, what is most worthy about his descriptions of the girls, and particularly of the leader of the group, is that Sammy holds them in contempt. Once we get beyond the descriptions of their bodies, we see nothing but derogatory comments directed at them, including the disrespectful nicknames that Sammy assigns to them. Nowhere is this more evident than in Sammys description of the leader, Queenie. The nickname delegate to her by Sammy points out the stereotypical snap judgment that Sammy makes about her constitution and social status initially, and to which Sammy rigidly adheres despite no real try of its accuracy. From the description of her prima donna legs, to his imagining of ... ...gels suggestion that he relent and keep his job, Sammy is in creation saying no to his parents and their attempt to put him on the road to lower-middle-class respectability. In the final analysis, it would seem that the most obvious explanation for why Sammy quits his job--the one that he implies--is actually the least plausible. While Sammy would like to portray himself as the fearless defender of the delicate sensibilities of innocent girls, the reality is that Sammys motives in quitting have far more to do with his own sensibilities than with those of the three girls. Work Cited Updike, John. A & P. The Bedford Introduction to Literature. 2nd Edition. Ed. Michael Meyer. Boston St. Martins Press, 1990. 407-411. Wells, Walter. John Updikes A & P Studies in Short Fiction, vol. 30, (1993) Spring, pp. 127(7).

How Miller creates Dramatic Tension in Act One of The Crucible Essay

Twentieth Century DramaHow does Miller form melodramatic tension in Act One of The melting pot?The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, focuses on Theocracy and the effect it back end have on a community, as well as on an individual. From Act One, Miller creates dramatic tension in many different ways. These include dramatic irony, and explosive twists in the plot, as well as the range of emotions that Millers characters express both(prenominal) frequently and eloquently.As the curtain rises, the audience argon fishy as to why a man who is so clearly distressed is sit down everyplace the girl, Betty, who lies motionless and inert on a bed. The audience grows more curious as he calls for God to help him, and the audience are intrigued, query what is happening. In a direct contrast to this, the end of the scene is loud and frantic, leaving nothing to the imagination, with all the girls screeching and accusing. The intense power that the girls? poses is intoxifying, and is illustrate d when a character orders?Let the marshal bring irons?This shows the control these children have, if they can alter the minds of these men, persuading them to lock up innocents. This also shows the control they have over the whole community. The visual impact of the opening scene is that of a ? not bad(p) spareness?, the live only contains the bare minimum needed. This also relates to the prude way of life, ?vanities? were frowned upon and rooms were furnished with only what was necessary. The fact that rev. Parris is ?evidently in prayer? has religious references which, as the play goes on, are confirmed. The quote ? in that location is a narrow window, through its panes the morning sunlight streams? also indicates that the room is basic ? it would seem that even lig... ...sympathy to those doomed to this fate, after doing nothing wrong, who are merely counters in Abigail?s sinister game to gain attention. When make out orders for ?the marshal to bring irons? it shows a high f orm of drama, as the curtain drops leaving the audience to imagine the next scene, innocent women cosmos drawn form their families. In conclusion, I enjoyed this play, and my reaction was enhanced by the dramatic tension Miller creates in so many ways. The upset(prenominal) twists and use of dramatic irony help to keep the audience?s attention, while the sub-plot of rivalry adds interest and also reflects the main plot. The abrupt ending of act one, reflects the abrupt ending of the play as a whole, leaving the remainder to the imagination. Ending like these force viewers to envision what would follow, and, at one time again this all adds to the dramatic tension.

Buy Essay Online: Dishonest Odysseus of Homers Odyssey -- Odyssey ess

The Dishonest Odysseus of Odyssey Once he returns to Ithaca, Odysseus displays dishonest behavior and does not once tell a individual who he actually is when first meeting him. Odysseus hides his identity at first, whether by actively assembly or passively not correcting their erroneous beliefs. He tells Pallas Athena, first, that he is from Crete, had killed a man there, and had gotten a ride with more or less Phoenicians to Ithaca. He tells Eumaios that he grew up in Crete, went to Troy for the Trojan War, returned to Crete subsequently and traveled to raid Egypt, where he was captured by Egyptians. Odysseus (as the beggar) says that he grew wealthy in Egypt, but was taken in by a man who meant to bewray him as a slave. He tells that he escaped, and found refuge in Thesprotia. Then on his way back home to Crete, people attempt to make him a slave again, he escaped again (although in a different fashion), and he ended up in Ithaca. exclude for the fact that its the story of a hard life, this bears absolutely no relation to the actual story of Odysseus. He tells everyone (or lets them believe) nearly the same taradiddle to everyone else that he meets in Ithaca before he kills the suitors. There are a few noticeable differences that we will get to, but one mustiness be consistent in ones lies, after all, in enemy-held territory. After killing the suitors, he tells Laertes a completely different lie, loosely centering around him (Odysseus as the stranger) having seen Odysseus alive after the Trojan War. Odysseus lies to his enemies for unadorned reasons he doesnt want them to know that Odysseus has returned. He starts off lying to his allies and friends for similar reasons. The only people who he can bequeath to know his identity are those he has te... ...and has to fight down his emotions, so we can relate to him. Ultimately, though, he keeps his self-control and wins out in the end, do him a true hero and a fine character. Works Cited and Consul ted Bloom, Harold , Homers Odyssey edited and with an Introduction, NY, Chelsea House 1988Crane, Gregory , Calypso Backgrounds and Conventions of the Odyssey, Frankfurt, Athenaeum 1988 Heubeck, Alfred, J.B. Hainsworth, et al. A commentary on Homers Odyssey. 3 Vols. Oxford PA4167 .H4813 1988 Homer. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. New York Vintage Books, 1989. Rengakos, Antonios. Homertext und die Hellenistichen Dichter. Hermes. Einzelschriften, Heft 64. Stuttgart, F. Steiner, 1993. Tracy, Stephen V. ,The Story of the Odyssey Princeton UP 1990 forefront der Valk, Marchinus. Textual Criticism of the Odyssey. Leiden A.W. Sijthoff, 1949.

Comparing the Ghost Stories: The Old Nurses Story versus The Ostler Ess

tracing stories have been general end-to-end the ages. During the nineteenth coke, there was a sudden boom and touch stories were do popular. report card verbalize was the main source of entertainment as there werent each films, TVs or computer games. People would gather around in groups telling or reading each other stories. The stories were made more very by the superstitions populate kept and as the rooms were lit by fatal candle light, it built a sense of atmosphere. Most touch sensation stories were pen in the nineteenth century period, so throng could speculate much(prenominal) things happening to them, in the places they lived. As storytelling was the main form of entertainment, people had goose egg to compare it to, so it built tension, suspense and fear. In the nineteenth century there werent gentlemans gentlemany scientific advances. Everything was blamed on high or supernatural forces, therefore, people believed the explanations given in ghost stories. I volition be comparing and contrasting four ghost stories which were solely create verbally in the nineteenth century. They are ?The experienced Nurse?s recital? by Elizabeth Gaskell, 1855 and ?The stableboy? by Wilkie Collins, 1855. ?The Old Nurse?s Story? by Elizabeth Gaskell is about a young girl (Miss Rosamund) and her nanny-goat (Hester) going to live with her great aunt (Miss Grace Furnivall) at her aunt?s schematic house called Furnivall sign. Strange events take place at Furnivall Hall and family secrets are revealed. The past comes back to haunt Miss Furnivall and spare art is resolved. ?The Ostler? by Wilkie Collins is about an unlucky man (Isaac Scratchard) who has a premonition of his death, being killed by a woman. His luck begins to make better when he meets a woman (Rebecca Murdock). He falls in get by and decides to hook up with to he... ...house in order to claim it to the deep unknown. In ?The Ostler?, Isaac Scratchard ensnare a ?lonely, road-side hunting lodge? to stay at as he was lost, he was in an area ?which he was entirely unacquainted with?. meet the student lodging was a ?thick, dark forest? which adds mystery to the lonely inn and creates an sample scene for the strange event. A ref in 1855 would stick ?The Old Nurse?s Story? to be extremely affright as the setting is located in a typical 1855 town, so people could imagine such events occurring in places they lived. The location is typically unearthly as the story it is in an isolated, large house during bad weather. However, this gives the reader repose as not few would live in stately houses. A contemporary reader would not find these as chilling as they?re apply to the special effects being used and in comparison, the ghost stories don?t seem scary. Comparing the Ghost Stories The Old Nurses Story versus The Ostler EssGhost stories have been popular throughout the ages. During the nineteenth century, there was a sudden boom and ghost s tories were made popular. Storytelling was the main source of entertainment as there werent any films, TVs or computer games. People would gather around in groups telling or reading each other stories. The stories were made more real by the superstitions people kept and as the rooms were lit by dim candle light, it built a sense of atmosphere. Most ghost stories were written in the nineteenth century period, so people could imagine such things happening to them, in the places they lived. As storytelling was the main form of entertainment, people had nothing to compare it to, so it built tension, suspense and fear. In the nineteenth century there werent many scientific advances. Everything was blamed on higher or supernatural forces, therefore, people believed the explanations given in ghost stories. I will be comparing and contrasting four ghost stories which were all written in the nineteenth century. They are ?The Old Nurse?s Story? by Elizabeth Gaskell, 1855 and ?The Ostler? by W ilkie Collins, 1855. ?The Old Nurse?s Story? by Elizabeth Gaskell is about a young girl (Miss Rosamund) and her nanny (Hester) going to live with her great aunt (Miss Grace Furnivall) at her aunt?s stately house called Furnivall Hall. Strange events take place at Furnivall Hall and family secrets are revealed. The past comes back to haunt Miss Furnivall and unfinished business is resolved. ?The Ostler? by Wilkie Collins is about an unlucky man (Isaac Scratchard) who has a premonition of his death, being killed by a woman. His luck begins to improve when he meets a woman (Rebecca Murdock). He falls in love and decides to marry to he... ...house in order to claim it to the deep unknown. In ?The Ostler?, Isaac Scratchard found a ?lonely, road-side inn? to stay at as he was lost, he was in an area ?which he was entirely unacquainted with?. Surrounding the inn was a ?thick, dark forest? which adds mystery to the lonely inn and creates an ideal scene for the strange event. A reader in 1855 would find ?The Old Nurse?s Story? to be extremely frightening as the setting is located in a typical 1855 town, so people could imagine such events occurring in places they lived. The location is typically ghostly as the story it is in an isolated, large house during bad weather. However, this gives the reader comfort as not few would live in stately houses. A contemporary reader would not find these as scary as they?re used to the special effects being used and in comparison, the ghost stories don?t seem scary.

The Folly of René Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations on Fir

The Folly of Ren Descartes Discourse on Method and Meditations on First PhilosophyIn order to embark on his collect for truth, Descartes offset devises his four rules which should serve as a solid base of operations for all else that he comes to understand. Those rules are here evaluated in terms of what they proceed to take into consideration. The rules are examined individually and consecutively, and are therefore likewise reiterated in order to be clear about them. Furthermore, the shape up of using these rules is also analyzed to some degree. Ultimately, however, it is my conjecture that Descartes four rules are non as solid a foundation as he claims, but break to consider key issues which are noted herein.Descartes first rule deals with the imagination of truth, and states it as follows.The first rule was never to accept some(prenominal)thing as true that I did not plainly know to be such that is to say, carefully to forefend hasty judgment and prejudice and to in clude nothing more in my judgments than what presented itself to my mind so clearly and so distinctly that I had no occasion to call it in doubt. (11)In essence, we are to accept however what is true. This brings up the question of how one can even know truth. For Descartes, the certain(p) truth is I think, therefore I am, which is his first principle. However, even if this is a certain truth, how can we know anything else to be true? More importantly, however, the first rule states that nothing should be accepted that can be called into doubt, or to accept only that which is indubit fitting. Yet how can anything be indubitable, save perhaps Descartes first principle, and even there some may be able to find flaws? It go forms doubtful whether anything can be proven beyond any reas... ..., then there is no thing that is easier to know than another.Descartes use of this approach is a false foundation as he does not see these complications. The underlying frailty of such rul es is that it assumes absolute truths, without exceptions. I do not know of any truths that are absolute, and do not know of anyone who does. only more importantly, this approach would be much more effective if it was an inductive, and not a deductive, method. With an inductive method Descartes could not be refuted with a mavin instance, and he would not need to account for all contesting situations. It seems doubtful whether an suddenly deductive method could ever exist, based on the limits of human knowledge. workings CitedRen Descartes. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. 4th edition. Trans. Donald A. Cress. capital of Indiana Hackett, 1998.