The Universes :: Semantics Language Essays

The UniversesI cant tell you what I was just thinking. As in Augustines view of intuition, the associations I registered were too free of any arrogateable limitations for me to verbalize the convey. Perhaps these associations were of diverging thoughts that take in not departed my mind. The approximately handy example of something equal is the simultaneity of champion perception. Each sense perception is specialized and in that respect removed from the whole and however also registered in the same moment. In the thought Im speaking of in that respect were different refers, we might even say a universe of concerns no(prenominal) of which I can fully express. This complex event might be considered incidental expense in regard to what I have learned to value. I am now attempting to acquire a greater appreciation of something I cannot verbalize, meaningful associations I cant excite a recurrence of through and through keying terminology into a computer.Semantic sensation is n ever original. It must always be familiar. Language does excite original sensations, as in the sound of a speakers voice, but the semantic experience itself is never sound or vision, or any other sense perception of the material universe. Original experience of semantics would be want immediately comprehending a language we never perceive in the beginning place. This kind of appreciation is possible with music. Music weve never heard before can be immediately appreciated as music, but semantics, like memory, must always be a response to what is already familiar.My concern is how to proceed. If I can only register verbally what has already buzz off familiar through cognitive means, my work with language is not direct toward spurring meaning for the first time. Has there ever been a first time in regard to comprehending language? Is anything we read utterly strange, or is it rather strangely familiar? We may read something and make no sense of it, and later return to it and find f amiliarity as if we always should have been able to comprehend this ill-tempered passage. This parallels how we initially acquire language through a growing familiarity with the effects of verbal expression. We learn to fortuitously repeat limited effects. We grow to appreciate what we had already experienced albeit as incidental and free of the constraints of communication. Infants can distinguish between phonemes their parents, having learned a particular language, can no longer tell apart (Pinker 264), and meaning is similar in this respect. To understand how this can work we must put out the notion that language makes meaning.