.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Assumptions on Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis

Cost-volume-profit (CVP) compend is used to expand and update the discipline obtained from breakeven analysis. It is necessary to underline that the critical part of the analysis is defined as the diaphragm where total be equal total revenues or, in different words, when fixed and variable costs equal total revenues. Actually, at this point the company is claimed not to experiences losses and gains. This breakeven point is an initial examination and CVP analysis follows it.Cost-volume-profit analysis shares similar important self-reliances as breakeven analysis. These assumes are The behavior of revenues and costs is claimed to be in linear throughout the relevant activity range. It elbow room that the concept of volume discounts on either sales or purchased materials. The whole factor affecting the costs is considered changes in activities. Costs are classified as variable and fixed and such(prenominal) classification is precise. No outcome finished goods inventories are observed as all produced units are sold. The sales mix is constant when the company is selling more than one work line and sales mix is defined as the ration of each(prenominal) production line to total sales. One more essential assumption is that in case a unit is produced in a item year, it should be sold this year as unsold units are distorting the analysis. unsold products are marked in books and defined as finished goods inventory. Further, such units are re-classified as assets and they are transferred to the next year.However, the risk that these goods wont be salable the next year because of deterioration and obsolescence is very high. CVP evoke be also used to develop probability distributions in manufacturing firms and in restaurant industry. CVP analysis is rather simple and it is often used as well explore the potential profit and pricing decisions. References Caldwell, Ch. W. , & Welch, J. K. (1989). Applications of Cost-Profit-Volume Analysis in the governmenta l Environment. Government Accountants Journal, Summer, 38. .

No comments:

Post a Comment